Paul Luckraft reviews ‘The Jewish Jesus’ by David Hoffbrand (Destiny Image, 2017).

There are now many books on the theme of the Jewishness of Jesus, but it is always interesting to come across another one and see if it provides anything extra to make it a worthwhile investment in time and money.

This relatively new book from David Hoffbrand, a Messianic Jew with a remarkable testimony, certainly does come into that category with a clear and significant contribution in the area of reconnecting Jew and Gentile in what is known as the One New Man (Eph 2:15).

Even though a lot of the content is familiar, Hoffbrand’s book comes across as fresh and incisive. He is a gifted communicator and has constructed his book neatly into three parts each with six chapters. The aim of the three sections is indicated by the subtitle: reconnecting with the truth about Jesus, Israel and the Church. It is in the third part that he provides that extra dimension on implications for the Church.

Changing Our Thinking

Part 1 focuses on Jesus himself and his Jewishness, including chapters on ‘Jesus the Man’, ‘The Ministry of Jesus’, and the Jewish disciples. The author wants us to meet Jesus as he really was, and as he (the author) now knows him. He sets about uncovering what has always been there from the start but which has been lost over the centuries.

Hoffbrand has come up with a neat way of describing what needs to happen when we turn to the Bible. We should REWIRE our brains, by which he means ‘Read Without Religion’ (take the first two letters of each word). This doesn’t mean forsaking sound doctrine, but means we must “read the Bible as if we hadn’t read it before – to remove the lens of our traditions, which causes us to skip past so many passages without seeing the details” (p14).

David Hoffbrand, a Messianic Jew with a remarkable testimony, is a gifted communicator whose writing is fresh and incisive.

Realising that Jesus was Jewish should change the way we think about Jews today and also about Israel. Part 2 tackles this issue, explaining how God has chosen Israel in the past and still loves her today. Church tradition may tell us God has finished with Israel, that he has moved on, but clearly this is not true. Hoffbrand examines the common fallacies that God has no further plans for the Jewish people and that he would rather punish them than restore them.

Practical Questions for the Church

Part 3 is where we learn about what this should all mean for the Church. The author shared with me that this part of the book was born out of his trips to the Ukraine with his friend Piers Arthur-Crow. Hoffbrand is a trustee of The David House that Piers runs and so was invited to go with him and speak to groups of Messianic rabbis and Christian pastors at their conferences. Here, Hoffbrand found that his message started to crystallise.

What had concerned him before was that while teaching on the Jewishness of Jesus was one thing, working it out in practice was quite another. How does it become real? The answer is found when Jew and Gentile come together as One New Man – a new community in Messiah.

In the first chapter in Part 3, Hoffbrand asks three key questions: What should this new community look like? How do the two people groups live together harmoniously? What principles can we learn from this process? He then seeks answers from Paul’s letter to the Romans, establishing five principles: humility, acceptance, identity, unity, service, and taking a chapter on each.

Realising that Jesus was Jewish should change the way we think about Jews today and about Israel – and it should affect the way we live, too.

Five Principles

Humility is a vital starting point. Neither Jew nor Gentile can boast about what they have. God has accepted each through what he has done in Christ, which should humble everyone and lead to mutual acceptance.

For each group to find their identity in the One New Man may be something of a mystery, but one which has now been revealed in Christ and which can be worked out, rather like a husband and wife within a marriage. Jew and Gentile remain distinct but find a unity in their common Saviour, who has broken down the middle wall of hostility that previously separated them. Now this barrier has been removed, both groups must make sure it isn’t rebuilt, whether in mind, heart or action.

The final principle which ties all these together is that of serving each other. This is more than tolerating or even understanding each other, connoting walking together and looking out for each other. Gentiles may often support Jews through various organisations and charities, but this can often still be at a distance rather than side by side. And do Messianic Jews actually find ways of loving and serving their Gentile brothers and sisters?

Worthwhile Contribution

These are all important challenges for the future as God continues to restore Hebraic roots to his Church and bring more Jewish people into a relationship with their Messiah. This book is a worthwhile contribution to this objective.

As Hoffbrand says clearly, “The Jewish people were not an accident that God would rather forget. The Gentile people are not second best or an afterthought. Together, this new community must be better, not worse, than what has come before” (p156).

‘The Jewish Jesus’ (paperback, 220 pages) is available from the author’s website for £10. Also available elsewhere online. Click here to watch the author’s testimony in an interview with Jewish Voice.

Torah portion: Exodus 25:1-27:19

Our weekly studies of the Torah bring us to the portion called T’rumah. It’s an interesting Hebrew word that means an offering, gift or contribution, often through sacrifice. It’s about service.

T’rumah comes from the root r-u-m, meaning to elevate. It’s an offering raised up to God, wherein the giving elevates the giver.

True Service

The context here is the materials required for the construction of the sanctuary in the wilderness, as God brought His people through the desert. They included wood, metals (gold, silver and brass), linen, animal skins, dyes, oil and jewels; with all manner of workmanship. All these were gifts offered willingly to build the Tabernacle as service to the God of Israel: a place where He would dwell with His people.

We recall that His command to Pharaoh was, Let My people go that they may serve Me (the Hebrew word abad also means worship - Ex 8:1). Their service was part of their worship of the living God. Our service is the same: to build space and time in our lives as a sanctuary to worship Him, and acknowledge His presence.

Voluntary Giving

The essential feature of these offerings is that they were to be a voluntary service – first, that materials were given willingly, and second, that each gift was to be the best of its kind, not just spare things.

Mandatory obedience was good (like obeying God’s instruction, direction and guidance - His Torah). For us it’s like obeying STOP signs or speed limits (sometimes!); we do it because we want to be law-abiding. But willing, voluntary service is like going the second mile - it’s from the heart. That’s the service that God looks for, and it leads to true worship (in spirit and in truth, not just a legal requirement). It raises up God and it elevates the giver.

For Israel, their choice was a thank-offering for freedom from slavery, and also a choice to undergo training in the wilderness to trust in the God of Israel. Do we also learn to trust Him through His training in our desert places? Remember His promise to be with us always (including in our desert places of loss, illness, fear, rejection or misunderstanding - Matt 28:20).

Jesus’ Advice

There is a quote on service by Mahatma Ghandi: The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others. But I think Jesus puts this better. He said, The best way to find yourself (your true self) is to lose yourself (your self-life) for Me and for the Gospel (that is, in the service of God). It’s good to serve others, but it’s better to serve and worship our Lord Jesus and share the good news of the Gospel. In this we become more like Him, who did not come to be served but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many (Matt 20:28). Then we find who we really are - His children.

Service to God is never oppressive. When we raise Him up in our lives through willing sacrificial offerings, for Him and for others, we too are exalted; we cannot out-give God. God looks on the heart, and its willing offerings and service. Let us follow King David’s example and offer our service and worship willingly, with a perfect or complete heart (1 Chron 29:9), in the freedom and peace God has given us through our Lord Jesus.

Author: Greg Stevenson

Confronting the pseudo-biblical beliefs of the NAR.

I feel I must speak further about the Prayer Day in the Wembley Arena last month. We have had a storm of emails and phone calls coming into the office. None of them have been abusive, but they have all expressed concern about the presence on the platform of speakers whose ministries are linked with certain pseudo-biblical beliefs and practices.

On the one hand I am very encouraged that so many Bible-believing Christians in the Arena, and those who watched online, are aware of the dangers facing the Church today. On the other hand, I am concerned that I was one of the speakers sharing the platform with the individuals in question, with whom I would not normally be associated.

Public Dissociation

Many of the emails have been critical of David Hathaway, whose ministry sponsored the event. For many years David’s ministry has been in Russia, Eastern Europe and in Israel, so our paths had not crossed until recently when he felt the Lord calling him to do evangelism in his home country. He has a passion for the gospel and he knows that our nation is in trouble, but having been absent from the church scene in Britain for so long, he trusted others to invite speakers to the Wembley Arena meeting. They brought in people of whom he had no knowledge and had never met.

I had accepted the invitation to lead the opening prayers of confession. I was expecting half an hour would be allocated for such an important part of a prayer day, but I was only allowed ten minutes. I left the Arena soon after the lunch break and I did not watch the afternoon’s footage until the following day. I was shocked to see some of the things that happened.

We have received many expressions of concern about the presence on the Wembley platform of speakers linked with certain pseudo-biblical beliefs and practices.

I want to take this opportunity of publicly dissociating Issachar Ministries and Prophecy Today UK from events in the second half of the Wembley Arena meeting. I was pleased to be involved in the act of repentance for the divisions between the black and white churches in Britain in the first half of the day. I have laboured for many years in inner-city areas of London longing to see such unity and believing that the day would come when God would use the vitality in the African and Caribbean churches to bring a fresh spiritual dynamic into the evangelisation of Britain. But I cannot endorse many of the other things that were spoken and prayed from the platform later during the prayer day.¹

Of course, I should have been aware that the enemy would do everything possible to spoil the day, but the amazing thing is that God can turn any situation around for good. When Joseph’s brothers sold him to the Egyptians, what they intended for harm, God used to work out his purposes for good. I believe God can do the same with the Wembley Arena meeting.

Its mixture of spirits reminded me of the ‘Toronto Blessing’ and the days when the magazine Prophecy Today was at the forefront of the battle for biblical truth. But because of this mixture at Wembley, the issue of error in charismatic churches has been brought right back to the fore and there now seems to be fresh opportunity to challenge and expose it.

Battle for Truth

Today, the battle for truth has never been sharper, nor has there been a greater need for Bible-believing Christians to stand together and to exercise godly discernment. The teachings of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) must be exposed or they will destroy the charismatic Church at the most critical period of history since the Second World War.

NAR Dominionist (‘Kingdom Now’) teaching is bringing ‘strange fire’ into the Church. In its crudest form states that we are in the last days and God has raised up a new group of ‘apostles’ with greater power and authority than the original apostles. Not only that, but individual believers are also granted unlimited power and blessing. Together, this ‘army’ are to found the Kingdom of God on earth, taking dominion over the nations and, in due time, when they have subdued all opposition to the gospel, Jesus will return and they will present the Kingdom to him. Dr Frances Rabbitts, our Managing Editor, has a long-standing interest in this subject and has written an excellent overview article which we are pleased to publish alongside this editorial. Please make it essential reading.

Because of this mixture at Wembley, the issue of error in charismatic churches has been brought to the fore and there now seems to be fresh opportunity to expose it.

Dominionism was the teaching of the ‘Kansas City Prophets’ whom John Wimber brought to Britain in July 1990. Bob Jones called them ‘Omega Apostles’ with more power than the ‘Alpha’ (i.e. first) Apostles and Paul Cain convinced John Wimber that he was the super-apostle with the task of presenting the Kingdom to Jesus. I spent a whole day trying to convince John that this was all based upon false prophecy. Sadly, he was deceived, but later repented and dismissed the Kansas City Fellowship and the Toronto Airport Fellowship from the Vineyard group of churches.

This is a sample of Paul Cain’s teaching:

If you have intimacy with God, they can’t kill you, they just can’t. There is something about you; you are connected to that vine: you’re just so close to Him. Oh, my friend, they can’t kill you…If you’re really in the vine and you’re the branch, then the life sap from the Son of the Living God keeps you from cancer, keeps you from dying, keeps you from death…Not only will they not have diseases, they will also not die. They will have the kind of imperishable bodies that are talked about in the 15^th chapter of Corinthians…This army is invincible. If you have intimacy with God, they can’t kill you.²

There is not a shred of biblical evidence to support this teaching but it had great appeal to people who had little knowledge of the Bible. It also appealed to church leaders with dwindling congregations who were longing for a revival and who grasped at anything that had popular appeal.

The harm that has been done since the 1990s to thousands of churches in Britain, America, Australia and throughout Europe is immeasurable. But the KCF teaching was not new; it had been around since the 1940s. It originated in 1948 in the so-called ‘Latter Rain Revival’ beginning in the Sharon Bible school, North Battlefield Saskatchewan, Canada. 

Latter Rain, or ‘Manifest Sons of God’ teaching (Rom 8:19) has never gone away since. It has a subtle appeal with its message of power to the powerless. Ever since the events in Toronto in the 1990s, Dominionist teachings and spiritual practices have been spread worldwide through books, music, the internet and through big Christian gatherings such as New Wine and Soul Survivor. Today it is almost impossible to find a charismatic church in this country that has not in some way bought into the influence of such as Bill Johnson and Bethel Church in Redding, California. It is also being promoted by a great many false prophets who use so-called words of knowledge and other spiritual devices to deceive the unwary.

The teachings of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) must be exposed or they will destroy the charismatic Church at the most critical period of history since the Second World War.

The Centrality of the Word

We are in a battle for the truth that has been raging in the Church throughout the Western nations for the past half-century or more. No doubt it is because we are in such a critical period of history that the enemy is doing everything possible to frustrate the purposes of God. The only way that this battle can be won is through re-discovering the centrality of the word of God in the life of the Church.

At Prophecy Today UK we recognise the seriousness of the battle and intend producing a new series studying the biblical word of God as given to the Old Testament Prophets, beginning next week with the ministry of Jeremiah. He faced a similar battle for truth when the nation was facing a threat to its very existence – a message that has great relevance for us today.

References

1 With the exception of the contributions of Barry Segal on Israel and anti-Semitism.

2 Quoted in Blessing the Church? (Hill et al, 1995), p90.

From hyper-grace to healing vibrations: how the NAR is leading charismatics astray.

*Longer article*

“Teach me to do your will, for you are my God; may your good Spirit lead me on level ground.” (Psalm 143:10)

At Prophecy Today UK, we believe that the Pentecostal movement of the early 20^th Century and the charismatic renewal movement of the 1960s and 70s were moves of God to equip his people with a greater understanding and appreciation of the Holy Spirit. We have often said that this equipping was intended for a specific purpose: to prepare the Church for effective witness in the 20^th and 21^st Centuries, during which time the global population has boomed and the religious map has changed dramatically.

However, we recognise the danger of such moves of God being hijacked and corrupted by human sin and satanic deception, and that this danger is no less today than it was in the days of the early Church. Then, the infiltration of the new-born Christian community by false teachers and false prophets led Paul and the other Apostles to speak often and passionately about the importance of guarding against deception.

It is in this context, and with regard for recent concerns surrounding David Hathaway’s January prayer day at Wembley Arena, that we feel a broader statement (perhaps the first of several) is also necessary on a particular movement infiltrating the Western charismatic Church.

We believe that this cluster of ministries, teachings, practices and attitudes, often referred to through the short-hand phrase ‘the New Apostolic Reformation’ or ‘NAR’, has the potential to steer charismatics completely off course. But what is the NAR, and how can we combat its teachings with biblical truth?

A Brief History

The NAR is today’s expression of the same teachings that birthed the Latter Rain Movement of the 1940s, the subsequent ‘Manifest Sons of God’ movement, the Kansas City Prophets, the Toronto Blessing (1994 on), events at Brownsville/Pensacola (1995-2000) and the Lakeland Florida ‘outpouring’ (2008).

During the mid-1990s, Dr Clifford Hill together with several other British church leaders joined to sound the alarm about events in Toronto, the outcome of which was the 1995 book ‘Blessing the Church?’, serialised in 2018 on Prophecy Today UK.¹ But though the alarm was sounded, the NAR movement has since only grown in reach and influence. Through the 2000s and 2010s, teachings that were once the domain of fringe itinerant revivalists filtered into the mainstream charismatic world.

The NAR today encompasses a loose collection of charismatic ministries, leaders and teachings without a central organising body or statement of beliefs, and defying traditional denominational categories. Many within it do not recognise the term ‘NAR’, though it was coined by one of the movement’s core founders, C. Peter Wagner.² It has also been termed ‘network Christianity’³ because of its nebulous, relational nature.

Today, NAR power-houses include Bill and Beni Johnson’s Bethel Church in Redding, California (formerly AOG, now independent), Hillsong Church in Australia (also formerly AOG, now independent), Catch the Fire in Toronto (formerly Toronto Airport Vineyard, now independent), Heidi Baker’s Iris Ministries and Rick Joyner’s Morningstar Ministries, amongst many others. You will find songs, teachings, books and events connected with these and other NAR ministries being promoted in most charismatic churches in Britain, at inter-denominational conferences, in Christian bookshops and on Christian TV and radio.

This ‘networking’ has been accomplished through a combination of music, literature, sympathetic publishing houses and media platforms,⁴ training programmes, social media use and platform-sharing/collaborations with well-respected ministries and leaders. The NAR now also has its own Bible ‘translation’ to boot.⁵

The global reach of this movement and the endurance of its core beliefs through time seem all the more insidious because of its lack of official organisation, prompting many to see a spiritual driving force behind it. So, what exactly do NAR proponents believe?

What are NAR Beliefs?

In many ways, the NAR borrows from biblical Christianity and most within the movement would still accept the basic tenets of the Gospel. It is evangelistic and charismatic; it believes the Bible is the inerrant Word of God. It also usually takes a conservative stance on moral issues, values prophecy, promotes social action and can encourage support for Israel. However, there are important aspects of the NAR which are inescapably unbiblical, which pollute and redirect genuinely-felt love for God.

Indeed, while we are not disputing the sincerity of ordinary believers caught up in the NAR movement, we believe that, followed thoroughly and consistently, it promotes ‘a different Jesus, a different spirit and a different Gospel’ (2 Cor 11:4).

The US General Council of the Assemblies of God wrote in their official denunciation of the Latter Rain Movement in 1949 that its theology “claims prerogatives to human agency which belong only to Christ”.⁶ This remains a good summary of the NAR movement today which, though now evolved beyond these roots, still bears similar hallmarks.

In short, the NAR movement encourages believers to claim for themselves things that belong only to our sovereign God and remain His to bestow as He wills: things such as power and authority, control and dominion, supernatural ability, blessing and success, health and prosperity. It is a Christianity that doesn’t know when or where to stop: an over-zealous movement of theological and spiritual excess characterised by a lack of biblical checks and balances.

With the caveat that the NAR is a loose movement that encompasses a lot of internal variation, and to which proponents may only subscribe partially or inconsistently, core NAR beliefs include:

1. The leadership of modern-day ‘apostles’ and ‘prophets’
   
2. Dominionism: the teaching that ahead of Jesus’ return, the Church will become all-powerful on earth and make it ready for the Lord⁷
   
3. The belief that unlimited divine power and blessing is available to believers to equip them for this task
   
4. An over-emphasis on the supernatural and extra-biblical revelation
   
5. An over-emphasis on power and human agency
   

In the remainder of this article, I will take these five NAR creeds and discuss briefly why each is attractive, deceptive and contrary to Scripture.

1. The leadership of modern-day ‘apostles’ and ‘prophets’

The NAR movement distorts Ephesians 2:20 to claim that God is raising up end times ‘super-apostles’ and prophets – equal to or greater than the original Apostles commissioned by Christ - who will lead the Church to this-worldly victory. The appeal of strong, charismatic leadership in an increasingly uncertain world, particularly to young people, should not be underestimated.

While Christians disagree about whether the biblical offices of Apostle and Prophet are still current today, what is certain is that an elitist movement of self-appointed, celebrity leaders claiming divine authority is thoroughly dangerous, as well as antithetical to Scripture.⁸ The cult-like focus on personality in the NAR has led some believers to travel the world in order to sit under the teaching of specific people, desperate to receive some personal blessing and accepting their words unquestioningly.

The highly concentrated power of this relatively small group of men and women – now commanding global influence and millions of dollars every year, while being treated as infallible superstars - can easily be (and has been) abused, as with the well-documented examples of Paul Cain and, more recently, Todd Bentley. Both of these men fell from grace spectacularly but were quickly ‘restored’ with a conspicuous absence of deep grieving and true repentance.

All this is a world away from the New Testament ekklesia, the community of faith built on one name alone: that of Jesus Christ. The original Apostles were team-playing ambassadors of the Gospel who placed high premiums on humility and servant leadership, not self-promotion and gaining a following (e.g. 1 Cor 3:4; 15:9). Their teaching emphasised the importance of weighing and testing all things (e.g. 1 Thess 5:21) and watching keenly for false teachers and prophets, as Jesus commanded (Matt 7:15-20). Those in positions of leadership knew they would be held to a higher standard because of their greater influence (James 3:1).

“I became a servant of this gospel by the gift of God’s grace, given me through the working of His power. Though I am less than the least of all the saints…” Apostle Paul, Ephesians 3:7-8

“He must become greater; I must become less…the one who is from the earth belongs to the earth, and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from heaven is above all.” John the Baptist, John 3:30-31

2. Dominionism: the teaching that ahead of Jesus’ return, the Church will become all-powerful on earth and make it ready for the Lord

Popular within the NAR movement are teachings like the Seven Mountain Mandate (the idea that Christians are supposed to take over the ‘seven mountains’ of culture in order to transform the world) and the concept of ‘bringing heaven to earth’, reclaiming society and Creation for the Kingdom.⁹

The biblical hope that believers will become bearers of light and blessing to their communities and nations through the transformative power of the Gospel and the Holy Spirit, and the understandable desire for revival, are extrapolated to such a degree that the responsibility for establishing a physical Kingdom of God on earth is transferred from Christ onto the shoulders of the Church.

The goal of re-establishing Christendom has obvious appeal to Christians in the West, who have hitherto watched their nations despise God and spin into terminal decline. But dig a little deeper and NAR Dominionism usurps Christ’s Lordship, wresting from him the mandate to redeem, restore and judge.

Indeed, the ‘Kingdom Now’ culture promises the victory of Christ’s return and the blessings of Heaven to believers in this life, creating false expectations that ‘things can only get better’ and that the next big revival is just around the corner. This stops people from truly seeking the Lord and understanding his purposes. It also blinds them to vast swathes of Scripture which speak of dreadful days of deception and persecution ahead of the Lord’s return.

When difficult times do come, or when wild predictions of revival don’t come true, expectations are disappointed and believers can be driven either into denial, or away from faith altogether.

“Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come” Jesus, Matthew 24:12-13

“But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Saviour from there, the Lord Jesus Christ” Apostle Paul, Philippians 3:20

3. The belief that unlimited divine power and blessing is available to believers to equip them for this task

Taking its cue from the Manifest Sons of God movement, NAR teachers emphasise that as God’s children destined to do great things in the world, believers can claim in faith lives of abundant blessing, health, supernatural power and infinite grace from God.¹⁰ Some, notoriously, have even argued that believers are ‘little gods’ who can attain to divinity and physical immortality.¹¹

The fleshly appeal of such promises of abundance is obvious (cf. Genesis 3:5). Deceptively, they take truths about the love, goodness, grace and blessing of God and blow them out of all proportion, well beyond scriptural boundaries. The life of faith is reworked around pursuing and ‘claiming’ this promised abundance, more than around growing in maturity and holiness. As such, NAR teaching de-emphasises concepts like discipline, judgment, sin and human weakness. It blurs the fundamental differences between God and humanity, exalting believers far above their given place.

Believers are told that illness and suffering are always consequences either of a lack of faith or of spiritual attack (rather than for any other reasons) while concepts such as repentance and denying one’s flesh are side-lined, as are scriptural injunctions to admonish, discern and warn.

The result is an entitled, spoilt Church culture – congruent with the consumeristic West at large. The NAR is known for its insatiable cry of ‘more!’

“If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.” Jesus, Matthew 16:24

“But we have this treasure in jars of clay to show that this all-surpassing power is from God and not from us. We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed.” Apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians 4:7-10

4. Strong emphasis on the supernatural and extra-biblical revelation

The NAR movement puts a premium emphasis on an experiential relationship with God, including miraculous healings, the imparting of spiritual gifts/anointing through the laying on of hands, tangible experiences of God’s glory, words of knowledge, angelic visitations, supernatural manifestations and miscellaneous signs and wonders (notorious examples of the latter include the appearance of gold dust, gold teeth and feathers).

Biblical accounts of Jesus and the Apostles speak of miracles which are rarely seen in today’s unbelieving, hyper-materialist West. Ordinary Christians are understandably hungry for the supernatural – not only for proof of God’s existence but in order to ‘walk as Jesus walked’. However, this biblical desire for authentic New Testament Christianity is taken too far by the NAR, with cries of ‘relationship not religion’ quickly becoming a reaction against all forms of biblical authority, order and structure (save for the authority of the ‘anointed’ apostles and prophets!) and a privileging instead of the spontaneous, the ‘reckless’, even the ‘out of control’.

Such a postmodern theology of experience fits right in with millennials, but comes with a low regard for Scripture and the basic tenets of the Gospel, as somehow insufficient. Instead, a gnostic pursuit of the spiritual and of ‘new’ knowledge opens believers up to spiritual influences and grand prophetic claims that are simply not of God. In the name of faith, discernment is abandoned and thinking is suspended.

Unsurprisingly, the NAR movement has been marked from the start by strange manifestations, esoteric experiences and an abundance of provably false ‘prophetic’ words – all encouraged by a church culture predisposed to unquestioning acceptance, with criticism shut down as ‘judgmentalism’.

“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Apostle John, 1 John 4:1

“…there has emerged a famine of the Word of God…[which] has left large numbers of Christians without the capacity to judge for themselves from Scripture whether a thing is from God or not. They are defenceless from error, both in the form of doctrine and practice…” Peter Fenwick¹²

5. Therefore, given the above, the NAR places a strong emphasis on power and human agency

NAR-influenced church culture today emphasises the spiritual ‘authority’ of believers and NAR teaching often purports to help people ‘trigger’, ‘activate’ or ‘awaken’ blessing, revival and supernatural experience. NAR language is suffused with authoritative terminology such as ‘releasing’, ‘imparting’, ‘anointing’, ‘activating’, ‘breaking’, ‘declaring’ and ‘pronouncing’.

Being clear on the nature and limits of our authority in Christ is vital if we are to avoid usurping his role and claiming power for ourselves that is not ours to claim. In the NAR, this desire to wield spiritual power sometimes fosters a militant emphasis on spiritual warfare, particularly the practice of ‘taking’ territories for the Kingdom in prayer by engaging with territorial demonic spirits.¹³ Faithful proclamation of the Gospel is superseded by a dangerous desire to engage with spiritual principalities, while a concern to deal with sin is replaced by a pre-occupation with enemy activity.

Without discernment, these kinds of attitudes can worsen the ‘name it and claim it’ culture described previously and lead to all sorts of self-interested, unwise actions. Bethel Church in California provides plentiful examples of such behaviour: e.g. pacing around Temple Mount declaring ‘victory’ over the enemy, praying for a friend who fell down a cliff instead of calling the emergency services, and trying to stop the California fires by prophesying rain and commanding the wind.

We are not in any way denying the possibility of Holy Spirit-inspired declarations, or divinely-prompted acts of faith, or the power of intercessory prayer. However, NAR teaching wrests these things away from God and puts them solely in the hands of humans, as if the Holy Spirit is a force that man can learn to wield and bend to his will. This unhealthy attitude towards control, combined with the aforementioned preoccupation with the supernatural, opens a door for the New Age.

New Age terminology like ‘shifts’, ‘alignment’ and ‘destiny’ are common within the NAR, as are hypnotic music and mystical practices borrowed from the occult. One well-known example is The Physics of Heaven, a 2012 book by authors including Kansas City Prophets Bob Jones and Larry Randolph, with contributions from widely-followed NAR personalities Bill Johnson and Kris Vallotton.

The book purports to ‘reclaim’ practices from the New Age like vibrations, healing energies, ‘dolphin therapy’ and ‘quantum mysticism’ to reveal secrets about how to achieve ‘personal transcendence’.¹⁴

“Many who had believed now came forward, confessing and disclosing their deeds. And a number of those who had practiced magic arts brought their books and burned them in front of everyone.” Acts 19:18-19

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’” Jesus, Matthew 7:21-23

Conclusions

The above overview is not comprehensive, as anyone who has looked into these matters will know. However, it is intended to clarify Prophecy Today’s position on this movement. Our assessment is that it ducks and weaves through biblical Christianity, blending truth with dangerous distortions and downright falsities.

It is thus a prime example of a movement of ‘mixture’. Nobody is saying that NAR teachers don’t ever say anything true or worthwhile – that’s precisely the point. They sometimes do. It is extremely difficult to critique their material without appearing uncharitable towards the truth contained within it. More discerning Christians have therefore tended to be divided by the influence of the NAR - some see the good and are unwilling to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Others reject it completely as outright deception (2 Cor 11:4). Many are simply fearful of speaking out against a movement that may include things ‘of God’, in case they accidentally blaspheme the Holy Spirit.

As I said at the start of this article, we are not disputing the sincerity of believers caught up in the NAR movement. However, broadly speaking, when NAR teaching and culture is held up to the light of Scripture, it fails virtually every single test. The problem is that it has intermingled with and now suffuses mainstream charismatic Christianity in Britain, which is one reason why so many faithful charismatics find themselves unable to find a sound church fellowship.

The growth of the NAR must be weighed before the Lord, especially in the light of scriptures forecasting deception during the times of the end. I do not believe, however, that ‘retreat’ is the only option left for faithful believers. A systematic critique is desperately needed and we must search the scriptures carefully to find out the truth, and be ready to defend it, contending earnestly for the faith (Jude 3). If the NAR really is as deceptive as it appears, the future of the Western Church and its witness may just hang in the balance.

Paul’s instruction to Timothy is particularly pertinent for us today:

“In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who will judge the living and the dead, and in view of his appearing and his kingdom, I give you this charge: Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction. For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry.” (2 Timothy 4:1-5)

Our thanks to the many readers who have raised this issue with us.

References

1 Click here to read our serialised version, which provides a useful history of the whole movement.

2 Wagner, CP, 1998. The New Apostolic Churches. Regal, CA, p18.

3 See Christerson, B and Flory, R, 2017. The Rise of Network Christianity: How Independent Leaders Are Changing the Religious Landscape. OUP USA.

4 E.g. Destiny Image, Charisma Media, God TV and TBN.

5 The ‘Passion Translation’, though it is really a paraphrase. Read critiques here and here and note its NAR connections here.

6 See chapter by David Forbes in Blessing the Church?

7 There are other streams of Dominionist theology that transcend charismatic circles. Not all have the same perspective on the end times.

8 Some, like Bill Johnson, do not claim these things overtly. But neither does he stop people from claiming them for him.

9 This end goal of subduing the whole earth can precipitate some strange alliances, at great doctrinal cost.

10 This overlaps considerably with the ‘Word of Faith’ movement/the idea of ‘positive confession’ and has synergy with the prosperity gospel, also secular psychology.

11 This is a misappropriation of Psalm 82:6/John 10:34 and stems especially from Manifest Sons of God teaching. It can shade into New Age assertions about ‘the divine within’ and be coupled with a down-playing of Christ as the first of many sons, or as a human endowed with divine power, rather than THE only begotten Son of God, fully human but also fully divine.

12 Blessing the Church? p50.

13 We are not saying that prayer is not important or spiritually significant, nor that believers cannot be led by God to pray strategically – but this must be led by God and not assumed.

14 Bethel Church in California recently hit the news for supporting the use of Christianised tarot cards as a form of outreach, and are known for the practice of ‘grave-soaking’: visiting the graves of Christian heroes and physically trying to ‘soak up’ some of the ‘anointing’.

Foreign Secretary regrets our turning back refugees from Nazi-occupied Europe

Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt’s apology over Britain’s treatment of Jews during the Mandate of Palestine is an encouraging development to be greatly applauded.

But it has been a long time in coming. Not from him, I mean, but from successive British Governments. He is believed to be the first holder of this office to have acknowledged our criminal behaviour over the plight of Jewish refugees trying to escape the Nazis.

Described by Mr Hunt as a ‘black moment’ in history, it involved denying entrance to the very homeland we had pledged to help recreate for the Jews at the time they needed it most. And Britain has been under a curse ever since, fulfilling the negative part of Genesis 12:3 – that those who curse the seed of Abraham would face judgment.

Mr Hunt was addressing the annual Parliamentary reception of Conservative Friends of Israel, hailing the “very strong relationship” between Britain and Israel and declaring Israel’s right to self-defence as being “absolutely unconditional”.

But he added: “There have been some black moments when we have done the wrong thing such as the 1939 White Paper which capped the number of visas issued to Jews wanting to go to the British mandate of Palestine.”¹

A Step in the Right Direction

Anne Heelis, who heads up a group² dedicated to comforting those who suffered as a result of British Mandate policies, said this “wonderful development” had come just a day after confession for our role was made during a Holocaust memorial service in Northern Ireland.

“Hundreds of thousands of Jewish people could have escaped death in the Nazi concentration camps if they had been allowed free entry into their ancient homeland, but Britain cruelly blocked this way of escape by severely restricting Jewish immigration,” Anne said.

Those who had been praying for a change of heart were “deeply grateful” for this development, but though Mr Hunt’s remarks were “most welcome”, they did not amount to an apology.

The Foreign Secretary’s apology over Britain’s treatment of Jews during the British Mandate is an encouraging development to be greatly applauded – although it is just the start of what is needed.

“They are indeed a wonderful answer to prayer and a great encouragement to continue praying with broken hearts for our Government to make a full apology to Israel. There is still a deep wound in the heart of many Israelis as a result of Britain’s misconduct of the Mandate.”

Rosie Ross, whose organisation Repairing the Breach has also been working with those who suffered under the Mandate, said Mr Hunt’s statement was “a major breakthrough” that was clearly an answer to prayer, some of which has been specifically targeted at the Foreign Office.

She plans to thank Mr Hunt personally and also looks forward to a full apology.

Reneging on Our Promise

The Atlit detention camp, near the port of Haifa, where many ‘illegal immigrants’ were held by the British. Photo: Gemma Blech.

Because the 1917 Balfour Declaration – promising to do all we could to aid Jewish repatriation – had subsequently been legitimised both by the 1920 Treaty of San Remo and the League of Nations in 1922, Britain had all the delegated power she needed to rescue many thousands of God’s chosen people from disaster.

But she failed to act because of Arab opposition, choosing to pursue a policy of appeasement that had never worked with Hitler. And we are still suffering the consequences, with the Middle East up in flames, the rest of Europe in turmoil and Britain in particular in a state of utter chaos and bewilderment.

We lost our empire, beginning with India in 1947, along with much of our power and influence and, as we succumbed increasingly to secularisation, we broke loose from our moral moorings. We also lost our sovereignty as we got sucked into the godless European whirlpool which further weakened our Judeo-Christian foundations.

All this leaves us frantically splashing about in an ocean of confusion with our political elite engaged in a desperate bid to avoid carrying out the people’s wish of regaining our national pride.

Blessing or Curse?

I pray that Mr Hunt will stick to his guns, and I would like to encourage him by emphasising the undeniable link – at both an individual and a national level – between political longevity and treatment of the Jews.

It is worth noting, for example, that the three longest-serving British Prime Ministers of the modern era – Harold Wilson, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair – were unflinching in their support for the Jews. I mentioned Wilson last week (see The Forgotten Friend of Israel). Mrs Thatcher not only helped save a Jewish girl’s life from the Holocaust but also served her strongly Jewish constituency faithfully throughout her Parliamentary career. Mr Blair inaugurated the annual Holocaust Memorial Day to help ensure it doesn’t happen again.

Britain had all the delegated power she needed to rescue many thousands of God’s chosen people from disaster, but she failed to act because of Arab opposition, choosing to pursue a policy of appeasement.

Others, including Neville Chamberlain, Anthony Eden, James Callaghan and even Winston Churchill, disappeared from the political scene after letting God’s ancient people down.³

Where are the great empires of the past – Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Greek and Roman – who have treated the ‘apple of God’s eye’ (Zech 2:8) with disdain? They are buried in the dust of history.

Operation Mordechai

With this in mind, Christians United for Israel UK has launched ‘Operation Mordecai’ to highlight the threat to Israel and the West posed by Iran, with the primary aim of ensuring that Britain positions itself on the right side of history by defending Israel against tyranny.

The campaign takes its inspiration from the biblical account of Esther’s cousin Mordecai who, having heard of a plot to annihilate the Jews, sought the Lord, warned about what was planned and took action.

Let’s not go the way of Ireland, Amnesty International or Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party. Ireland is currently pushing through legislation designed to boycott the sale of Israeli products from so-called “illegal settlements in occupied territories”.⁴ They are referring to Judea and Samaria, which is the heart of Israel though obviously disputed by those who oppose the Jewish right to the land (which, as I said, is theirs by international treaty as well as God’s sovereign word).

Amnesty International is calling for a boycott of Israel’s tourism industry in the same region, accusing them of “occupation, human rights violations and war crimes”.⁵

Paul Charney, chairman of the Zionist Federation of the UK and Ireland, said the humanitarian organisation thus demonstrates its lack of neutrality by whitewashing any Palestinian culpability for the conflict.

“Amnesty must recognise the incitement, the children’s television programmes encouraging violence and terrorism, and the salaries to convicted terrorists under the Palestinian Authority’s ‘Pay to Slay’ policy, to name but a few of the many disgraces which bear much responsibility for the current situation.”

He added that such boycotts harm the very people they wish to help.

Friend or Foe?

Returning to our relationship with the Jewish state, Labour ties with its sister party in Israel were officially cut last year over its handling of anti-Semitism, which bodes ill for any potential Labour-led British Government.

It was in 2016 that Mr Corbyn refused an invitation from Isaac Herzog, then leader of Israel’s Labour Party, to visit Israel and tour the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum.

Herzog, now Chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, is reported to be “extremely distraught” by what is happening in Britain’s Labour Party.⁶

Christians United for Israel UK has launched ‘Operation Mordecai’ to ensure that Britain positions itself on the right side of history by defending Israel against tyranny.

So should we be. And our Foreign Office has a bad record of dealings with Israel; so let’s hope Mr Hunt’s statement signals a turning of the tide.

For we do not wish to be numbered among Israel’s enemies, of whom the Psalmist wrote: “’Come’, they say, ‘let us destroy them as a nation, that the name of Israel be remembered no more.’” (Ps 83:4).

And Psalm 146 adds: “Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save. When their spirit departs, they return to the ground; on that very day their plans come to nothing” (verses 3-4).

References

1 United with Israel, 1 February 2019.

2 Nachamu Ami (Comfort ye my people – Isaiah 40:1).

3 Pawson, D. Defending Christian Zionism. Terra Nova Publications, p152/3.

4 Haaretz, 29 November 2018.

5 United with Israel, 30 January 2019.

6 Jerusalem News Network, 30 January 2019, quoting the Jerusalem Post.

Paul Luckraft reviews ‘Biblical Church’ by Beresford Job (Bethany Publishing, 2007).

This excellent book challenges the traditional way that Christians do ‘church’, and explains what should be in place instead. The author aims to show that the church-going practices Christians generally observe are based upon teachings that have little or nothing to do with the Bible. Rather, they originated with men who led the Church after the Apostles were dead and the writings of the New Testament had been completed.

Though now over ten years old, this remains another useful resource for Christians who are currently ‘out of church’ – or who are seeking to rethink their current approach to church.

Delving into Ecclesiastical History

The book is in three parts. The first, called Traditions, starts by reviewing the Jewish ‘traditions of the elders’, which Jesus opposed. The author draws heavily on the teaching of others in these early chapters and the material may be familiar to many, but it forms a necessary background to his argument: that we have made the same mistakes, by building our own church traditions.

In chapters 4 and 5, Job looks in detail at the traditions of the early ‘Church Fathers’. He focuses on six from the two centuries after the Apostles: Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Cyprian of Carthage. Job is clear that they didn’t get everything wrong; in fact, he praises them for spreading the good news and preserving the truth of the Gospel in the face of heresy. For this they deserve honour and respect.

But Job does take issue with the church practices they introduced, which stemmed from a fundamental flaw regarding leadership. By introducing a clergy/laity divide, they created a new priesthood and layers of hierarchy which led to further errors.

This new system of ecclesiastical power and authority made it inevitable that any teachings introduced from the top would be readily accepted - whether in line with Scripture or not. In time, without the necessary input from Scripture, it was unavoidable that the Church would morph into a human organisation you could join, rather than a living organism - Christ’s Body.

Job traces how over several centuries, the Church morphed from a living organism – Christ’s Body – into a human organisation.

Job’s revealing analysis of modern-day church is summarised helpfully with a ‘Not-To-Do’ list: things which believers unquestioningly accept but which actively go against Scripture (p100).

In Chapter 8, he considers common objections to his argument: God still seems to bless such churches. The Holy Spirit is still at work. So why cause trouble and upset people? Here the author offers an honest assessment of these questions, but remains adamant that the status quo means we are missing out on God’s best!

Discovering Biblical Church

Part Two, entitled Biblical Church, is more positive in outlook and considers in detail what biblical church should look like. The author repeatedly stresses that he is not drawing a contrast between true and false churches, but between biblical and unbiblical practices.

He highlights four key areas that, for him, make up the minimum for a biblical church:

• Leadership should reflect that in Acts, with elders as overseers, not a ruling hierarchy;
  
• Home meetings are best for developing fellowship and deep relationships;
• Worship should be led by the Spirit and reflect the unity of the Body of Christ, and
  
• The Lord’s Supper should be celebrated with a proper meal, not just a quick snack of tokens.
  

Like Steve Maltz’s work on Hebraic church, Job emphasises function over form. Get the function right and the correct form of church practice will emerge.

Job acknowledges that biblical churches are not guaranteed to be problem-free. They can still be unloving or undisciplined. But if they have the right ‘shape’ then there is greater opportunity for the Lord to change people.
The author closes Part Two with a chapter entitled ‘What the Experts Say’. He wants to show that all he has been proposing is not just his opinion but is backed up by theologians.

The author repeatedly stresses that he is not drawing a contrast between true and false churches, but between biblical and unbiblical practices.

What to Do?

Part Three brings something new and special to the growing debate on ‘out of church’ Christianity: If you do want to change, how do you go about it?

Job offers many pieces of good advice and some sound ground-rules, drawing on his own experience and testimony. For those who end up leaving their current churches, he insists there is no need for unpleasantness and advises on how to leave peacefully, retaining bonds of fellowship with those who remain. He also stresses that changing to meeting in a home may not itself be the answer – and that any attempt to start up a new form of church should be preceded by and birthed in prayer. Seeking the Lord, and asking what he wants, is vital.

Job is down-to-earth and practical, not romantic: he explains that for Christians wanting to pursue radical transformation in their church practice, it is important to take it slowly and learn to walk before you can run, learning to listen to others and growing in patience.

His list of ‘Dos and Don’ts’ is particular useful, as are his FAQs and chapter of advice on how to look for outside help (however, despite its good general suggestions this has been removed from the Kindle version since its mentions of specific people are now out of date). The key, he suggests, is to seek out those with maturity and a strong sense of morality: just being well-meaning or having a ‘ministry’ may not be enough to guarantee a good start-up or later growth.

This book is a worthwhile addition to the growing literature on ‘alternative’ forms of church that seek greater fidelity to Scripture. Nobody is claiming to have published the final word on this issue, but this book will undoubtedly be a worthwhile, thought-provoking addition to the shelves of anyone in a quandary over it.

‘Biblical Church’ (288 pages, paperback) is available from Amazon for £8.96. Also on Amazon Kindle. Find out more at www.house-church.org.

Torah Portion: Exodus 21:1-24:18.

What comes into mind when you read the word ‘law’? Do you think of restrictions and limitations? Or release and freedom? This portion follows what we call the Ten Commandments, often remembered as a list starting with “Thou shalt not…”. Yet these commands were given to Israel as a liberating skeleton enabling the movement of walking with the LORD their God, just as our muscles can only produce useful movement as they pull against the frame of our bones. The Laws start with the reminder: “I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.”

As we move on to further laws that add flesh to the skeleton, the LORD again refers to servants and slavery, teaching Israel how to live in freedom with new responsibility as masters. Slavery conjures up pictures of the brutality of the slave trade or the forced labour of Egypt. But Hebrew bond-servants were to be freed in the seventh year, although they could choose to remain for life, secure in knowing that they would be provided with all that they needed in return for their work. Do we love our Master so much that we publicly commit our lives to His service, completely trusting Him to care for us?

It is for freedom that Christ has set us free…But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature; rather serve one another in love. The entire law is summed up in a single command: Love your neighbour as yourself. (Galatians 5:1, 13-14)

God’s laws were given to ensure fair treatment of people, protection of property and a legal system that balanced justice with mercy. They were given to a nation who had been in bondage, under foreign gods. Now they must only serve the LORD, who had delivered them.

The Israelites knew what it was like to live as aliens - so they must not mistreat the foreigners among them. They must not take advantage of widows or orphans - for they knew what it was to have suffered. Over 400 years in the iron-smelting furnace of Egypt (Deut 4:20) refined the Jews so that they were now in a position to show empathy to the vulnerable, living out the command to ‘love you neighbour as yourself’. They were called to be the LORD’s chosen people in covenant relationship with Him – a covenant requiring great responsibility as well as offering great privilege.

The LORD promised to lead Israel and clear their enemies before them so that they could take the land. If they kept to their commitment to serve Him only, He would bless their food and water, their health and fruitfulness. Moses communicated all of the LORD’s words and laws to the people. Their response was: ‘We will do everything the LORD has said; we will obey’. If they had continued to obey, they would have remained holy – set apart from other nations. Yet, again and again they took steps to become like others and so faced the Lord’s rebuke. How often do we say “Yes” to the Lord and believe that we will be His faithful servants while our lives remain so much like those in the world around us?

Richard Wurmbrand (‘In God’s Underground’) wrote that there are two kinds of Christians: those who sincerely believe in God and those who, just as sincerely, believe that they believe. You can tell them apart by their actions in decisive moments. Wurmbrand’s faith was tested through 14 years of torture and imprisonment. How will we be tested in this time when so much in our nation is being shaken?

Author: Catharine Pakington

Torah Portion: Exodus 18:1-20:23, 'Yitro' (Jethro)

Jethro, Moses' father-in-law, visits him in the wild, bringing his wife and sons in advance of the law of God being given.

A Kingdom of Priests

The Lord our God is One. Moses' family was now together again. His father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian, had also been united with God’s people, converted by the testimony of all the good things the Lord had done for Israel in rescuing them from the hand of the Egyptians who had treated them arrogantly. Moses’ testimony was, "My father's God was my helper. He saved me from the sword of Pharaoh". Indeed, this was three times true: not only through the mighty deliverance of the whole nation at the Red Sea; Moses was also saved from Pharaoh's murderous sword at birth. God also saved him from the sword of justice when, as a young man, Moses killed an Egyptian and hid him in the sand, after witnessing his mistreatment of a fellow Hebrew.

Jethro was welcomed into the community of Aaron and the elders of Israel as he brought his sacrifices and they ate bread together in the presence of God. The next day, Moses took his seat to serve as judge for the people. One man to judge more than a million people…Jethro, blessed with wisdom for the moment, saw God's solution:

Teach them God's decrees and laws and show them the way to live…choose capable men who fear God, trustworthy men who hate dishonest gain to…serve as judges for the people but have them bring every difficult case to you.

Jethro showed Moses that even though God is one, leadership is plural – that the Lord wants a kingdom of priests.

The Fear of the Lord

They came to Mt Sinai, probably the same place as Mt Horeb, where Moses saw the flaming, unconsumed bush and heard the call of God. God descended in fire on the mountain. There was thunder and lightning; thick cloud and smoke as from a furnace billowed upwards; the whole mountain trembled violently. God's voice shook the earth.

The trumpet sound grew continually louder and everyone in the camp trembled. The sight was so terrifying, even Moses said he was trembling with fear. God spoke His laws: the ten commandments. The people stayed at a distance. “The fear of God will be with you to keep you from sinning”, Moses said.

How much we need the fear of God in our society today! We rejoice, that we “have not come to a mountain…to thick darkness, fire and tempest…[but] to the city of the living God…to thousands upon thousands of joyfully assembled angels” (Heb 12:18-22). And we rejoice that “What the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the sinful nature, God did, in sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering” (Rom 8:3-4). Yet, there is still great need of that reverential awe and fear of the Lord in our hearts and homes. We need, in our nation, to hear, learn and remember His words all over again – and to do them.

God is truly shaking the nations - and perhaps this one in particular at the moment - so that what cannot be shaken may remain. May He keep us in His grace to stand in unity on the truth of His word, walking in the reverential fear of the Lord, with our attention focused on Him in all things.

Author: Sally Bolton

The Church needs to return to the whole word of God – for the nation’s sake.

“Where there is no vision, the people perish” – so says an ancient proverb in the Authorised Version. The NIV translates it “Where there is no revelation, the people cast off restraint” (Prov 29:18).

Both of these statements are good descriptions of what is happening in Britain today, in Parliament and in the streets around Westminster. There is no clear vision in our Government or among our elected representatives. And the people in the street merely shout slogans at each other expressing contrary views. Why is this? And why is this happening at such a crucial period in the history of the nation?

The simple answer is that we are living in a generation that has abandoned truth. Everywhere, we are surrounded by lies and deception. Social media is full of it and our newspapers cannot be trusted – they all have their own agendas to promote. Even the BBC, that was founded upon biblical principles of declaring truth to the nations, has succumbed to the epidemic of ‘fake news’, promoting ideology while pretending to be impartial.

Listening to BBC Radio 4, the flagship of national news broadcasting, is painful today as the interviewers constantly interrupt those they are questioning, trying to force their own views (which are clearly biased towards ‘remaining’ under the dominion of Brussels and undermining every attempt to get a clear and clean Brexit).

Unexpected Co-operation

There was, however, a significant shift in the House of Commons this week as panic at the prospect of leaving the EU with no deal gripped MPs of all parties and persuasions. This caused them to move from simply declaring what they won’t accept, to searching for some common ground. It was a major change of attitude which brought agreement that Government and Opposition parties will combine in the search for an acceptable deal. Of course, this should have happened two years ago - it might have avoided the current impasse with Brussels that looks impossible to solve at this late hour.

We are living in a generation that has abandoned truth.

It certainly looks as though our MPs have left it too late in coming to a common agreement in time to find an acceptable arrangement with the EU. The Prime Minister may be given the impossible task of going back to Brussels and attempting to re-open negotiations which the 27 other members of the EU consider closed.

Is there any hope? Certainly, for we believe in the power of prayer. Many Christians came together in meetings all over Britain last Saturday, observing a call to pray for the nation.

Dr Hill and David Hathaway, Wembley Arena, 26 January 2019.Faithful, believing prayer is never wasted and it may be that it was the day of prayer that influenced the MPs to move towards a more positive position, searching for a way forward together.

Different Theologies

But I have to be honest about my own involvement in the Day of Prayer. I was given the privilege of leading the opening slot at a large prayer meeting in the Wembley Arena which brought together Christians from a wide variety of church backgrounds both on the platform and in the hall (it was live-streamed and is still available on Youtube). The format of the meeting was good, following the biblical example of Daniel’s prayer – beginning with worship and confession before coming before the Lord with our requests.

In my experience this is the first time that leaders of the black and white churches of Britain have come together on the same platform confessing their division, asking God’s forgiveness and seeking his blessing upon the nation. I have been working with Africans and African-Caribbean churches for more than 50 years and longing to see relationships of love and unity that would release spiritual power into the nation.

The leaders of these churches came to Wembley last Saturday but they did not invite their large congregations so it was a mainly white congregation in the Arena. There was a sense in which they were just dipping their toes in the water before fully committing themselves to working together. This is a start – but there is much more work to be done.
Leaders pray for unity, Wembley Arena, Saturday 26 January 2019.

I am by no means criticising those who organised the meeting at short notice which was a valiant attempt to reproduce the kind of united praying church that succeeded in praying the nation to victory at Dunkirk and in the 1940 Battle of Britain. But it was nonetheless apparent that there is still a lack of clear, unified vision in the Church, even among believing charismatic evangelicals.

It may be that the lack of clear vision on Saturday was the result of cultural differences in the approach to prayer and worship. But I personally have never found these to be a barrier: I can worship in different cultures – and levels of sound! The thing I did find difficult was sharing the platform with those who have very different theologies: especially leaders who are expecting imminent revival.

Return to Biblical Truth

I made a statement that there will be no revival in the nation until there is repentance in the Church and I believe that to be true. Jeremiah faced a similar situation from false prophets who were telling the people of Jerusalem not to worry about the threat from the Babylonians because God would protect the city. Jeremiah told the truth that God would not protect a city full of idolatry, immorality, greed, lies and deception. He called for confession and repentance and this should be our call to the nation today. But it will never be heard in the nation until it is proclaimed in the Church first of all.

The Wembley meeting was a great start, and I believe it really affected the political realm in the following days, but it also revealed the enormous need for Christians of all traditions to search the scriptures in a common endeavour to recover biblical truth – starting with defining the very nature and purposes of God.

The Wembley meeting was a great start, but it also revealed the enormous need for Christians of all traditions to recover biblical truth.

The Church has glibly taken over God’s covenantal promises to Israel without ever understanding God’s true purposes and how he intends fulfilling them. We need to go back to Isaiah 55 and study carefully the word of the Lord,

As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. As the rain and the snow come down from heaven and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth it will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.

Replacement Theology must be swept from the Church, along with the false teaching, prophecy and spiritual practices of the so-called ‘New Apostolic Reformation’ (NAR) that are muddying the spiritual waters and creating confusion in the Church. The only way to find clear vision with which to give a lead to the nation is for the Church to return to biblical truth and declare the whole word of God.

Prayer Day at Wembley Arena, Saturday 26 January.