A thoughtful evaluation of development priorities

How the nationwide strikes are a symptom of deeper malaise

UK’s economic crisis and community responsibility

Monster or hero?

By Susan Gibbs, daughter-in-law of a former Governor of Rhodesia.

Very few, black or white, genuinely mourn the death of Robert Mugabe. They may praise him as ‘an icon of Africa’s liberation’, but few will genuinely mourn his passing. Nor should they, for even by the abysmal standards of post-colonial Africa, ‘Comrade Bob’ was particularly bad.

In his first address after becoming President of Zimbabwe (then Rhodesia) following the 1979 Lancaster House Agreement, he surprised even his supporters by declaring in clipped English: “I urge you, whether you are black or white, to join me in a new pledge…to forget our grim past, forgive others, and forget.” Yet it was Mugabe himself who never forgot or forgave. Years ago a close friend of his said: “Mugabe hates…nobody hates like Mugabe.”

Not fully aware of the depth of this hate, nor of the spiritual battle being waged, many have searched for other answers to his murderous malevolence. The fact remains that Mugabe was no founding father of Zimbabwe: he was the appalling destroyer of the ‘Jewel of Africa’.

Mugabe’s True Colours

Mugabe in 1982In the midst of the ‘Chimurenga’ (Zimbabwe’s war of liberation from white rule begun in the 1970s by bush fighters), at a summit of post-colonial African leaders in Gabon (West Africa), crucial decisions were imminent on Zimbabwe’s future leadership. The choice was between supporting Mugabe or his arch-rival, Joshua Nkomo. Mugabe was armed and supported by China, while Nkomo was armed and supported by Russia. Mugabe won the day – but he wanted one-party rule and in 1984 Nkomo fled temporarily to England.

Soon after taking power in 1980 Mugabe showed his true colours, as a tyrant intolerant of opposition, consolidating his power in what became known as the ‘Gukurahundi massacre’ in Matabeleland. A conservative estimate concluded that 20,000 black civilians (including women and children) were slaughtered in what has been classified internationally as genocide.

As the nation plunged into decades of famine, an HIV epidemic and hyperinflation in which the central bank printed useless notes (in one night 12 zeros were wiped off the currency), the arch-proponent of pan-Africanism and Marxism sought to apportion blame for the chaos and turned on Zimbabwe’s 4,000 white farmers.

Nothing better sums up Mugabe’s madness: the farmers were among Africa’s most efficient producers of food, the backbone of the economy and essential to the country’s survival, yet he turned on them with murderous viciousness. In the six months before we left at the end of 1983, 10% of the white farmers in our district had been murdered (including, during one Easter holiday, two little girls - school friends of our son - on a neighbouring farm).

Years ago a close friend of his said: “Mugabe hates…nobody hates like Mugabe.”

Brazen Corruption

Few leaders in modern history have been more brazenly corrupt than Mugabe. As the nation sunk into impoverishment, he taunted his citizens by throwing lavish parties at which French champagne and caviar were served.

During those long years many of us kept praying and asking the Lord how he could keep getting away with it for so long. But in Zimbabwe the elderly are respected and as the only African leader who had fought in a ‘war of liberation’, Mugabe was venerated in surrounding countries. Eventually his people were so weakened that they were unable to rise up against him and ZANU, his political party.

Realising at one point that his country needed to work to feed itself, Mugabe briefly pacified white farmers by offering Denis Norman the job of Minister of Agriculture (Norman, previously a minister in Ian Smith’s government, now lives in the UK and runs a small Christian charity dedicated to helping those who suffered during the war years). But after Mandela was released in 1990 and the glory bestowed on Mugabe as the golden boy of Africa shifted southwards, Mugabe ceased trying to woo the world.

Mbare township before (left) and after (right) Operation MurambatsvinaHe sent army personnel to DRC to plunder their diamonds and rape their women, and used army brutality to pillage Zimbabwe’s own diamonds, leading to the suffering and deaths of civilians in Marange. One of his worst actions, in the middle of a very severe winter in 2005, was Operation ‘Clear out Rubbish’ (Murambatsvina) in which he bulldozed slums in Harare. This resulted in the loss of some 700,000 homes and livelihoods, with an estimated 2.4 million indirectly affected. This still haunts many in Zimbabwe today.

Learning to Forgive

Despite his fierce anti-colonialism, declared Marxism and determination to end British rule, Mugabe clung to many customs that echoed colonial rule and maintained a deep personal admiration for the Queen.¹

My father-in-law represented the Queen in his capacity of Governor of Rhodesia between 1959 and 1969 and Mugabe wrote a glowing introduction to his biography “honouring him as a man of principle and commitment”.

He later followed this up by sending the 5^th Brigade, his North Korea-trained praetorian guard, to kill our family.

We left the country, but the couple who bought our farm were murdered a few months later. We feel profoundly blessed to have escaped without having had a family tragedy. A great many of us have had to learn the true meaning of forgiveness. I remain overwhelmed and grateful for the privilege to have felt the closeness of God during those years. 

I remain overwhelmed and grateful for the privilege to have felt the closeness of God during those years.

How to Eulogise

Throughout his long reign, much of Mugabe’s corruption and depravity was unknown to the wider world, as he stifled freedom of expression. Newspapers faced censorship and a ruthless and unrelenting onslaught was mounted on journalists, media houses and individuals who dared express themselves. On one particular occasion I remember the Bulawayo Chronicle was published with an entirely blank front page.

The tragic wreck of a country Zimbabwe became remained two years after Mugabe was deposed in an army coup. Mnangagwa, who has taken over, was involved with Mugabe’s atrocities and is generally regarded as worse.

Reflecting on Mugabe’s death, Fr. William Guri (CSsR, PhD) said the following:

For me to eulogize Robert Gabriel Mugabe would be an act of great betrayal to the many people who died and whose lives have been damaged for life by his long rule.

To eulogize Mugabe for me is to capitulate and give up the struggle for human rights and social justice. It will be to celebrate the triumph of the evil over the good, the false over the true, the darkness over the light, the irrational over the rational, the inhuman over the human.

After thinking long and hard about Robert Gabriel Mugabe, I have concluded that it is alright to feel no sadness and grief. It is alright not to mourn. It is also alright not to feel guilty for not feeling sad and for not mourning. Much as he disregarded Christian values and much as he debased humanity, I shall not allow him to diminish my Christian faith nor my humanity, which in Africa we call Ubuntu.

“Moreover, no man knows when his hour will come:
As fish are caught in a cruel net,
Or birds taken in a snare,
So men are trapped by evil times
That fall unexpectedly upon them”

(Ecclesiastes 9:12)

Susan Gibbs is the daughter-in-law of the late Sir Humphrey Gibbs, former Governor of Southern Rhodesia. She is the author of Call Of The Litany Bird: Surviving The Zimbabwe Bush War (2011, Loose Chippings).

Notes

1 A devout Catholic, educated by Jesuits, Mugabe was also a deeply religious man. His mother lived with him during his early years in Government House and each morning they took communion together. As the years went by and we began to see the face of evil in his actions, many felt that the Vatican should have taken action against him. Instead (grotesquely, it was felt) he was even permitted to attended the funeral of Pope John Paul II in 2005.

BBC finally highlights unapologetic faith in action.

Alongside the triumph of the Ashers Bakery court victory comes news of the ongoing nationwide impact of Christians Against Poverty (CAP).

At a time when we are witnessing an ever-widening gulf between rich and poor, the CAP organisation founded by John Kirkby has swept across the country like a refreshing wave of compassion, setting up branches in many towns and cities and providing tremendous relief and support to countless people often feeling overwhelmed by mountainous debts.

The BBC’s sympathetic hour-long profiling of their work in The Debt Saviours documentary (BBC2) was as welcome as it was unexpected.

Inability to pay off arrears often leads to the most enormous pressures on families, and it is this that CAP workers understand so well as they combine their excellent debt counselling services with a generous dose of genuine care – and, yes, they do offer to pray for clients while respecting their wishes however they respond.

Unapologetic Faith

I was very struck with the TV programme and delighted that the BBC had for once shown Christians in a very positive light. It helped that the participants were boldly unapologetic about praying for people in the process.

They are in a sense fulfilling Jesus’ Great Commission (that his disciples should spread the Gospel everywhere) in a double-track way – both by preaching the good news and by not forgetting the poor, as Christ commanded us.

At a time when we are witnessing an ever-widening gulf between rich and poor, CAP has swept across the country like a refreshing wave of compassion.

I had a bit to do with CAP some years ago when I was sports editor of the Selby Times in North Yorkshire. On the rare occasions when sporting issues did not require my immediate attention, I wrote a few stories about what they were doing including the testimony of how a family became Christians after they were helped out of debt.

I then organised a cricket match to raise money for them – and comedian Tommy Cannon played for my team, giving a pretty decent all-round performance!

As some of my colleagues at Prophecy Today have said, the situation of personal debt in the current economic climate is bound to get worse – Brexit or no Brexit – and there will be an increasing need for this inspiring work.

Faith in Action

The BBC2 programme followed the lives of some very brave CAP clients and frontline workers battling amidst the current UK poverty epidemic, and showed the wonderful work being done through the local Church.

CAP advisers were seen going into people’s homes and praying with clients. Many were helped out of debt and subsequently began attending church.

It’s this sort of focus on the work and motivation of Christians that could well contribute in part to a turning of the tide in the nation as the genuineness of a supernatural faith borne out of a real relationship with God is seen in action – and on the TV screen!

Perhaps there is hope yet for the BBC!

'The Debt Saviours' is still available on iPlayer: click here to watch. 

Clifford Hill reacts to the result of the General Election...

All the political pundits have been astonished by the result of the General Election. The polls predicted a very different picture with Labour and the Conservatives running neck-and-neck in England but significant gains for the minor parties.

None of this happened. The one place the pollsters got it right was in Scotland where even well-known Lib Dem and Labour political leaders were swept aside in a tsunami of nationalism.

The common factor

The one common factor between the result in England and that in Scotland is that the people have voted for their own self-interest. The Scottish National Party appealed not only to the tribal instinct of Scots but also to their own self-interest, pledging to be a force in Westminster that will ensure that a larger slice of the economic cake will go to Scotland and they will all be better off by having SNP members there to put Scotland first.

The one common factor between the result in England and that in Scotland is that the people have voted for their own self-interest."

South of the border, the Conservatives played the same economic card appealing to people's self-interest; that they will be better off by voting Conservative who are steering the nation towards more prosperous times. It was a message designed to appeal to those who are doing reasonably well and hope to do better.

The real losers

The losers in this election are the poor, the unemployed, the powerless - those who didn't even feel it was worthwhile voting. They knew that they would not get a larger slice of the cake - whoever triumphed at the polls. The millions who live in our inner-city areas and who exist on welfare, or scrape a living on a day-to-day basis with no job security: they are the forgotten multitude who live in ghettos of hopelessness and despair.

The real losers of this election are the poor, powerless and marginalised. What will happen to them now?"

What will happen to the poor and powerless as the nation enjoys increasing prosperity? The legacy of colonial slavery is still rampant among those from an African-Caribbean background, who still carry the names of their British plantation owners and are unable to trace their African roots. Will anyone in the new government stop and ask why there are more young black men in prison in Britain than in university?

Will anyone care for those who still suffer from the legacy of industrial exploitation leftover from the Industrial Revolution and the dark times of 19th century Britain? Will anything be done to change the culture of despair that engulfs whole communities in our big cities?

Deep-rooted problems

One thing is certain: if nothing is done; if no-one cares, deep-rooted sense of injustice and frustration will boil over once again, as they did in the riots that began in Tottenham in August 2011 and spilled over into other parts of London and Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Bristol and other cities.

This is the word of the Lord to prosperous Britain- it is the word that Jeremiah gave to the city of Jerusalem at a time of prosperity when the word of God was ignored (Jer 7:4-8):

If you really change your ways and your actions and deal with each other justly, if you do not opporess the alien, the fatherless or the widow and do not shed innocent blood in this place, in the land I gave to your forefathers for ever and ever. But look, you are trusting in deceptive words that are worthless."

In the first issue of Prophecy Today, 30 years ago, we carried an article under the title “A World of Inequality” which said that more than 10 million children had died of starvation during the previous year, 1984.

There were 500 million people in Africa suffering from malnutrition. It was at a time when huge swathes of eastern Africa were suffering from years of drought. 1 million people had died of starvation in Ethiopia and 7 million people in that country were living under the threat of starvation.

From 1985 to 2015

Prophecy Today joined others in sending out an urgent appeal for aid from the rich countries of the West to be sent to people facing death. In July 1985 Bob Geldof responded with the first ever Live Aid when pop stars freely gave a concert at Wembley to raise funds for the starving. Later that same year Comic Relief was founded on Christmas Day 1985 which was later linked with Sport Relief and Children in Need. These events, attracting huge television audiences, have raised hundreds of millions of pounds which have undoubtedly brought relief to many communities struggling with poverty.

"World poverty was halved between 1990 and 2010, according to the World Bank. But the world of inequality still exists."

World poverty was halved between 1990 and 2010, according to the World Bank.¹ But this does not mean that poverty has been eliminated. The world of inequality still exists despite the immense amount of aid that is poured into developing countries. One billion people still live on less than $1.25 a day.² Most of the world’s population still lack basic services which people in the developed nations take for granted – access to safe water, healthcare, electricity, schools and adequate food.

Inequality persists

In 1985 we said:

The rich nations use their muscle to protect their prosperity. They control the world’s capital investment. They control the price of basic commodities on the world markets, such as grain, seeds and fertilisers. They have a monopoly of technology which they deny to third world countries thus keeping them dependent on the West and limiting competition. They control interest rates and thus ensure that any aid given to poor countries comes back to the rich nations to increase their overflowing abundance.

That situation still exists today and should be a serious warning to us because justice and righteousness are part of the nature of God. When we deny justice to the powerless we are actually offending God who says “For I, the Lord, love justice, I hate robbery and iniquity” (Isa 61:8). There are plenty of instances in history where nations or communities have brought disaster upon themselves through injustice and oppression. Sodom and Gomorrah are two good examples.

"When we deny justice to the powerless, we are actually offending God"

Most people think Sodom and Gomorrah came to disaster because of sexual deviance but the Prophet Ezekiel says something different. He says there was another reason why God destroyed those two great cities. “This was the sin of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen” (Eze 16:49).

Western wealth offensive to God

What are the things that are most offensive to a God of justice and righteousness? They are surely the vast wealth controlled by 1% of the world’s population while so many struggle with poverty. The enormous amount of money spent on slimming aids and reducing obesity in the rich nations while others die of starvation must be deeply offensive to God. He said to the Prophet Isaiah that the kind of justice and righteousness he wants is “to share your food with the hungry and to provide the poor wander with shelter – when you see the naked, clothe him...Then your righteousness will go before you, and the glory of the Lord will be your rearguard” (Isa 58:7-8).

"The nations have the power and the technology in our generation to feed the hungry and to care for all people, but we choose to indulge ourselves"

The monumental amount of money spent on weapons of destruction by the nations is deeply offensive to God. We are more concerned with destroying one another than with caring for the poor and those who are powerless to provide for themselves. “The Lord is angry with all nations; his wrath is upon all their armies. He will totally destroy them, he will give them over to slaughter” (Isa 34:2).

The nations have the power and the technology in our generation to feed the hungry and to care for all people, but we choose to indulge ourselves, to pile up wealth that we can never use such as the grain mountains, the butter mountains, the meat mountains of Europe and America. We choose to maintain vast armies and vast stocks of weaponry and we turn a blind eye to the poor, the powerless and the hungry.

What will a God of justice and righteousness do with this generation?

References

1 World Bank Poverty Overview, 2011 data.

2 Ibid.