How has the separation of the Church from its Jewish roots affected our faith communities?

In this series we have focussed purposely on personal relationship with God, from which we now move carefully towards the role of community. It is all too easy to place community as a priority over personal relationship with God. This is the way many church fellowships have consolidated, where the weekly Sunday service forms a large percentage of what Christian life is considered to be. It is all too easy to adopt this same mindset and consider that the restoration of our Hebraic heritage must primarily influence the Sunday (or Saturday) service.

This may be the reason why some groups have sought to copy the synagogue, sort of acting out a Gentile version of Jewishness. Personally, I have been surprised and sometimes shocked at what I have seen in some congregations, emphasising Jewish symbolism and clothing – the externalisation of traditional symbols rather than the internalisation of spiritual truth.

More than that, there have been those who have converted to Judaism, which usually requires a verbal rejection that Yeshua (Jesus) is Messiah. I am not against the use of some symbolism from Jewish tradition, of course and, in balance, there is much good in valuing these traditions and building bridges, but not as an end in itself.

Community of Faith

Nevertheless, God is building a community of faith rather than a group of individual believers. A key issue in the restoration of the Hebraic character of community is recognition that the Olive Tree of Romans 11 is a picture of one community of Jews and Gentiles living by faith that Yeshua is Messiah, saved through his shed blood on the Cross.

The Olive Tree of Romans 11 is a picture of one community of Jews and Gentiles living by faith that Yeshua is Messiah.

This re-connection with Messianic Jews re-defines the Christian Church as it was intended to be from the time of the first Apostles of Yeshua. Note, however, that it is faith in Yeshua the Messiah that is our shared heritage, not traditional Judaism which denies Yeshua as Messiah despite our common route to Father Abraham.

The Emergence of the Covenant Community

The writer to the Hebrews made it clear that meeting together is something that believers must strive to do (Heb 10:25). We all, as individuals, look back to “our father Abraham” for the model of individual faith and a personal walk with God, but we are not intended to live this out just as individuals.

Human history can be divided into four recognisable stages in the formation of God’s intended covenant community. First, there was Abraham and his family.

Secondly, Abraham’s physical descendants identified as a nation, learning to walk together with God as they journeyed from Egypt to the Promised Land. Israel was shown Torah in an explicitly communal way, because they now formed an interactive community. As well as the laws that were given to govern all aspects of community life and daily interaction, the Sabbath and Feasts were introduced to draw the community - individually, in families and as a nation - into fellowship with God.

This period of Israel’s history must be studied to find the foundations from which Christianity has since emerged. There is also much value in studying the Jewish community up to the present day (with the cautions I have indicated in earlier articles).

The writer to the Hebrews made it clear that meeting together is something that believers must strive to do.

The third stage of the emergence of the covenant community has been since the time of Yeshua. Yeshua took the “curse of Torah” (Gal 3:13) – the punishment for sin – from those who believe in him so that we could all, both Jew and Gentile, submit to the leading of God through his Holy Spirit to have Torah written on our hearts (Jer 31:33; Rom 8).

We were intended to learn together how to be a worldwide community of faith with the new authority to interpret Torah given to Bible teachers, pastors and elders in local communities throughout the world.

The fourth stage will be the Millennial community following Yeshua’s return. We must wait patiently for this and wonder at just how it will all come together.

Separation from the Roots of the Faith

Satan threw a spanner into the works when he persuaded Christian leaders, from approximately the third century on, that God had finished with the Jews. The result was cultivation of alternative Christian traditions, including modifications of the Sabbath and the Feasts (see for example Tishrei Journal Archive Number 17: From Sabbath to Sunday, Passover to Easter and Dedication to Christmas (Some Historical Background)).

A multitude of Church characteristics and traditions have emerged among the various denominations since the days when leaders of the Church in the Gentile world separated from their historic connection to Israel. Anti-Semitism was a terrible consequence that led to a mistaken pride that the Church had replaced Israel.

In so doing many denominations emerged, some trying to replace the religious order of ancient Israel with their own definition of the priesthood and the Feasts. Eloquent liturgies have emerged, but often robbing church members of their personal walk with God.

Satan threw a spanner into the works when he persuaded Christian leaders that God had finished with the Jews.

Some branches of the Christian Church nevertheless retained much of the true heritage passed on, including baptism and regular remembrance of the Lord through the bread and wine of communion. The Lord has blessed his Church over these years despite much that needs restoration and re-thinking.

Greco-Roman Influence

When the Christian Church distanced itself from the Jews, Greco-Roman influence crept in to fill the vacuum. It is instructive to consider the diocese, for instance, which is Roman in origin and inclines towards a centralised system of administration with local representation. Some hierarchical structures of Anglo-Catholic church leadership, including the priesthood, owe much to Greco-Roman traditions of clergy and laity and centralised control.

Also, the idea of a Greek Theatre has imposed itself more than we realise on a large number of congregational meetings (see, for example, Tishrei Journal Archive Number 42, From the Theatre to the Home). This is a major area for consideration to understand the consequences of the Christian Church departing from its original roots.

Time to Restore the Roots

Now is the time to gradually put things right. We cannot over-ride the authority given by God to local communities of Christians, so at best we can suggest taking counsel together. Since this is the prophetic moment for Christians to re-discover their ancient inheritance and re-root more firmly into the flow of covenant history, neglect of this could lead to greater deviation, even succumbing to deception, in the coming days.

This is the prophetic moment for Christians to re-discover their ancient inheritance and re-root more firmly into the flow of covenant history.

There is already a flood of strange spiritual experience here and there in the Christian Church that seems to come more from New Age spirituality than from the Holy Spirit. Something will always come in to fill a vacuum. It is noticeable how many Christians are thirsting for change, recognising the dryness of much traditional Church experience.

Next week this series will continue by offering some suggestions as to the beginning of an agenda – ideas for how to move forward in collectively re-discovering our Hebraic roots.

Next time: Re-thinking Community