Lawless activists could sink hopes of economic recovery

Are you ready to stand firm?

Will Britain stand with Israel in the end times?

Dr Clifford Hill concludes his comparison of the charismatic movement with the characteristics of the society in which it grew.

Sensuousness

The charismatic movement has encouraged the physical expression of emotion. The new songs, new forms of worship and freedom of expression have been a wonderfully liberating experience for millions of believers who felt repressed and oppressed within the institutionalised traditions of the mainline churches. The renewal movement came like a breath of fresh air in a stale room.

It brought new life and vitality not only to worship, but also to evangelism and outreach into the community in many churches. The experience of being filled with the Spirit is a transforming and life-giving event which no-one who has entered into it would ever wish to deny.

Yet this same liberating experience has had dangerous side-effects. The new liberty and freedom enjoyed by charismatics in their worship has extended into personal relationships where Spirit-filled believers are regarded as a specially-favoured group, honoured by God and thereby standing in a special relationship not only to him but to each other. The emphasis upon freedom and informality is accompanied by biblical teaching giving an emphasis upon 'grace' rather than 'law' which has tended to create an atmosphere of permissiveness in personal relationships.

There have been many casualties of this charismatic freedom, such as the church in South Wales in the early 1980s where a 'prophecy' was received that everyone should have a spiritual partner. They set about fulfilling this 'prophecy' regardless of sex or marriage relationships. Close partnerships often excluded a spouse and spiritual intimacy soon included physical intimacy. Even the pastor was caught up in this and had to come to repentance and renounce the policy before the whole church moved into disaster.

Other problems have occurred through practices associated with deliverance from demonic possession. In places, this included a teaching that demons need to be exorcised from their point of entry into the body. Those who have been victims of sexual abuse have been ministered to by the laying on of hands and anointing with oil in their private parts. There are indications that these practices have been much more widespread than the few highly-publicised reports.

The charismatic emphasis upon freedom and informality has often led to permissiveness in personal relationships.

The very widespread publicity given to the 'Nine-O'Clock Service', a Sheffield-based charismatic rave-type worship led by the Reverend Chris Brain shocked the nation in August 1995. The NOS was originally based at St Thomas' Crookes Parish Church under Robert Warren but complaints from neighbours about the noise led to its breakaway and independent operation under the unsupervised leadership of Chris Brain.

He used hard rock music, strobe lights and wild dancing by scantily-clad girls in his rave-type trendy services aimed to attract young people raised in the pop culture. The NOS aimed to make them feel at home and comfortable with the Gospel presentation.

Stephen Lowe, Archdeacon of Sheffield was reported in the press to have said that about 20 women had allegedly been sexually abused by Brain who practised intimate laying on of hands for healing and deliverance. Press reports linked Chris Brain with John Wimber, from whom he was said to have learned his healing practices. Wimber was reported in the press as saying, “We encouraged Chris's church and gave a gift to enable the Nine-O'Clock Service to get started."¹

Brain not only had links with Wimber but was also strongly attracted to Matthew Fox's New Age teachings. The lurid press reports indicated that the NOS was moving dangerously close to the inclusion of sexual practices as part of worship.

A major weakness of the charismatic movement is that its teaching has not had a strong emphasis upon moral values. Its anti-legalism has in fact left the door open for worldly standards of sexual freedom to become commonplace. Charismatic churches throughout Britain have suffered from adulterous relationships and marriage breakdown. This has been common, not only in house church streams, but also in the mainline charismatic churches.

There are no comparative figures available, but from personal knowledge of the church scene across the denominations I would estimate that the incidence of adultery and marriage breakdown among leaders and church members in the charismatic churches is considerably greater than in non-charismatic churches. This is further evidence of the influence of the world and especially of pop culture.

The anti-legalism of the charismatic movement has left the door open for worldly standards of sexual freedom to become commonplace.

Lawlessness

Untrained leadership in the new independent churches gave itself great freedom to develop along lines untrammelled by the kind of ministerial and clergy professionalism of leaders in the mainline churches.

From the earliest days there was difficulty over accountability. House churches were often led by a single leader who assumed autonomous control. Other fellowships developed team leaderships or elderships with shared authority. Even these could be highly authoritarian and were not accountable to church members' meetings, as in the mainline churches.

Over time there has been a coming together of most independent fellowships into 'streams' or sects, each with their own form of hierarchical authority. In some of these the top leader is recognised as an 'apostle' and the apostles of the different streams sometimes recognise a form of accountability to each other on a network basis.

Authority within the charismatic movement is a problem. The Pentecostal movement at the beginning of the century rapidly developed structures of organisation and accountability but the charismatic movement has produced no such equivalent. This is, no doubt, partly because the renewal has run right across denominational lines, from Roman Catholic to Brethren.

This lack of authority structure within the movement is also partly accounted for by the social environment in which it was born. The 1960s and 1970s were years of radical social change when all established mores and past traditions were being challenged. It was essentially a period of social anarchy which was birthed into the charismatic movement. It was a spirit that resisted traditional authority, yet its leaders often insisted upon a greater obedience to them by their church members than is accorded to ministers in the mainline churches, from which they broke away to seek a new freedom!

The Pentecostal movement rapidly developed structures of organisation and accountability but the charismatic movement has produced no such equivalent.

Attitudes to authority within the charismatic movement have tended to adulate leaders, especially those with high-profile ministries. This has had a serious detrimental effect upon the exercise of discernment by individual church members. The teaching of the leader is regarded as sacrosanct. Individual members are not encouraged to challenge their teaching or practices, which leaves the people wide open to deception if the leaders themselves go astray.

This teaching prepared the way for the rapid spread of the Toronto phenomenon initiated by Rodney Howard-Browne, who spent some years prior to Toronto working on his method of transmitting what he called his 'ministry of laughter'.

Speaking to a meeting in Birmingham in June 1994, he exhorted people to submit their wills to him and not to weigh what was happening. “Don't try to work it out with your natural mind,” he said, “for the things of the Spirit of God are foolishness to the natural mind.” His hypnotic technique soon had the whole audience under his control falling about in uncontrollable laughter and physical jerks. Clearly none of them realised they were being duped with false teaching.

The mind of the believer is renewed by the Spirit of God (Rom 12:2) which also enables us to know the truth and to resist deception - provided we do not submit ourselves to charlatans and deceivers!

Power

John Wimber came to Britain in the 1980s to a nation steeped in a sense of powerlessness from loss of empire and world prestige. The Church was suffering from 40 years of steep decline which leaders were powerless to stem. Wimber came with a promise of power, divine power, Holy Spirit power, available to all Spirit-filled believers if they would allow themselves to be released from the shackles of tradition and let the Holy Spirit flow through them.

This message could not have been more apt. Power to the powerless. It was exactly what British Christians wanted. Leaders and people lapped it up. No more doom and gloom. No more struggling against uneven odds. Here was real power to give victory to triumph over the powers of darkness. The devil had had the Church on the run for far too long; here at last was the power to overcome the enemy.

John Wimber came to Britain in the 1980s with a promise of power, divine power.

Wimber taught that all adversity, including ill health, could be due to demonic activity. Through the power of the Holy Spirit, sickness could be overcome and even cancer healed. An even more popular promise was that ordinary believers could exercise the gift of healing provided they learned the techniques and had the faith. They could drive out demons and scatter the enemies of the Gospel.

Wimber also brought a new concept of evangelism, coining the term 'power evangelism'. This was just what charismatics wanted to hear. They were able to discard the old-fashioned Gospel presentations of Billy Graham and crusade evangelism with its calls for repentance. Here was something new and exciting. They only had to believe and the Holy Spirit would do it through signs and wonders which would astonish the unbelievers and bring them flocking into the Kingdom. It was a 'Kingdom Now' theology that appealed strongly to a generation raised on instant results, instant food, instant credit, instant news.

In 1990 Wimber came back with the Kansas City 'prophets', having embraced their Latter Rain teachings of a great end-time harvest to be reaped by an irresistible 'Joel's army' of overcomers, which fitted neatly into Wimber's concept of power evangelism. They even promised power to overcome the final enemy, death, and enable the elite company of the elect to be part of the final generation, the immortal Bride of Christ.

Four years later, just as the backlash of unfulfilled promises and false prophecy was plunging charismatic churches into gloom and the new churches had plateaued, the Toronto Blessing burst upon the scene with its new wave of promises of power - power in the most attractive form of all - power for self.

This came at a time of great vulnerability for British charismatics. Many leaders confessed to being spiritually dry, discouraged and disappointed. The great wave of prophecy had come to nothing. Promises to leaders that they would be preaching to multitudes in sports stadia and arenas and witnessing before princes and powerful leaders, all now had a hollow ring. Their leadership was on the line.

They threw themselves into some highly-publicised outreaches with expansive promises. The JIM campaign, which was supposed to produce 5 million converts, went off like a damp squib. So too did the Revival Fire campaign. Reinhardt Bonnke's much publicised and highly expensive £7 million campaign raised even higher expectations but proved to be the most spectacular failure of them all, with a mere 16,000 responses from a mail drop to 24 million households.

British charismatic and Pentecostal leaders were at an all-time low at the very moment when they heard that something new was happening across the Atlantic. A new fountain of spiritual life was flowing in Toronto promising a new filling of divine power. It was wonderful news to know that God was giving revival somewhere in the Western world where for 20 years we had only heard of news of great awakenings among the poor non-industrial nations, where church congregations were numbered in their thousands or tens of thousands.

British charismatic and Pentecostal leaders were at an all-time low at the very moment when they heard that something new was happening across the Atlantic.

But the most exciting news was that the blessing was transportable! Eleanor Mumford (wife of the leader of the South London Vineyard Fellowship) had been and got it, and brought it back, and passed it on to others. If she could do it, surely others could do the same. Here was real hope for hard-pressed pastors struggling to maintain their local church witness; they rushed to book their flights to Toronto.

Very few went to test the spirits in obedience to New Testament teaching. They were more interested in the simple pragmatic test: Does it work? Will it work for me? They reached out eager hands to any from the hastily-enlisted local leadership team who had got 'it' and would pass 'it' on to them. They fell about laughing, twitching and roaring, then hurried back to pass 'it' onto others.

The latest power trip had arrived! The child of the age - the age of powerlessness - had reached adolescence. As John Arnott, pastor of the Toronto Vineyard Church, put it “It's party time! We are like little children coming to their father to play.”

Conclusion

After decades of the charismatic renewal movement, all we have to show for it in Britain is a nation infinitely worse in its moral, spiritual and social behaviour, a nation facing economic collapse and social disaster, while many of those to whom God has entrusted the precious gifts of his Holy Spirit fall about in uncontrollable laughter.

There are many indications that we are near to the point when the world's economy will crumble and a period of unprecedented lawlessness will sweep across the nations.

If ever the Church was needed to take up the mantle of the prophet to declare the word of the Living God and the way of salvation as the only hope for mankind, it is surely today! The charismatic/evangelical sector of the Church believes the Bible to be the word of God and also acknowledges the presence and power of the Holy Spirit among his people. But today these very churches are being torn asunder by division, resulting from the excitement of fleshly manifestations which are a massive diversion and distraction, preventing the Church from fulfilling the real purposes of God.

The Holy Spirit has indeed been poured out in abundance throughout this century. The Spirit of God does indeed give us supernatural power - but it is not power for self-aggrandisement or power for self-fulfilment, or power to exercise power over other sinners, but power to declare the word of the Living God with power and authority.

When will we stop playing the world's games? When will we come to our senses like the prodigal son and return to the Father? Will the charismatic movement have to come to total disaster before we realise how grossly we have been deceived and how we have prostituted the precious gifts of the Holy Spirit and sold our birthright for a mess of pottage?

What is the answer to the question, 'Was the charismatic movement initiated by God?' We shall delay attempting to answer this, until we have considered other aspects of the history and development of the movement.

Next week: Peter Fenwick unpacks the roots of the Toronto Blessing.

References

1 Quoted in Today magazine, 24 August 1995.

First published 1995. Revised and serialised November 2017. You can find previous instalments in this series here.